THE GOVERNMENT OF MOSCOW

ORDER

On the creation of an Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles*

Document with changes made:
(Bulletin of the Mayor and Government of Moscow, No. 34, 06/18/2013);
dated October 29, 2013 N 622-RP (Bulletin of the Mayor and Government of Moscow, N 61, 05.11.2013);
by order of the Moscow Government of August 5, 2014 N 408-RP (Official website of the Mayor and Government of Moscow www.mos.ru, 08/06/2014);
by order of the Moscow Government dated August 11, 2015 N 453-RP (Official website of the Mayor and Government of Moscow www.mos.ru, 08/13/2015) (for the procedure for entry into force, see paragraph 3 of the order of the Moscow Government dated August 11, 2015 N 453- RP);
(Official website of the Mayor and Government of Moscow www.mos.ru, 07/13/2016);
(Official website of the Mayor and Government of Moscow www.mos.ru, 11/16/2016);
(Official website of the Mayor and Government of Moscow www.mos.ru, 12/15/2016) (came into force on January 1, 2017);
(Official website of the Mayor and Government of Moscow www.mos.ru, 11/13/2018);
(Official website of the Mayor and Government of Moscow www.mos.ru, 04/23/20190.
____________________________________________________________________

________________

* Title as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated June 13, 2013 N 297-RP..

In order to strengthen control over the validity of spending funds from the budget of the city of Moscow in accordance with the approved state programs of the city of Moscow:

1. Create an Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles.
by order of the Moscow Government of June 13, 2013 N 297-RP.

2. Approve the composition of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles in accordance with Appendix 1 to this order.
(Clause as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated June 13, 2013 N 297-RP.

3. Approve the Regulations of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles in accordance with Appendix 2 to this order.
(Clause as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated June 13, 2013 N 297-RP.

4. To recognize as invalid:

4.1. Order of the Moscow Government dated August 19, 2009 N 1828-RP “On measures to optimize budget expenditures of the city of Moscow.”

4.2. Order of the First Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government dated December 16, 2009 N 106-РЗМ “On approval of the procedures for submitting information and making decisions on the placement of government orders by the Temporary Working Group.”

4.3. Order of the Moscow Government dated July 9, 2010 N 1438-RP "On introducing amendments to the order of the Moscow Government dated August 19, 2009 N 1828-RP".

5. Control over the implementation of this order is entrusted to the Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government on issues economic policy and property and land relations Efimova V.V.
(Clause as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated April 22, 2019 N 166-RP.

Mayor of Moscow
S.S. Sobyanin

Appendix 1. Composition of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles

Annex 1

by order of the Moscow Government
dated April 22, 2019 N 166-RP. -
See previous edition)

Composition of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles

The Chairman of the IWG is the Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government on issues of economic policy and property and land relations.

Deputy chairmen of the IWG:

Minister of the Moscow Government, Head of the Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow;

Head of the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy.

Members of the IWG:

Minister of the Moscow Government, Head of the Moscow City Finance Department;

Minister of the Moscow Government, Head of the Main Control Directorate of the city of Moscow;

Representative of the Office of the Federal Antimonopoly Service for Moscow (as agreed);

Representative of the main manager of budget funds (on procurement issues of subordinate institutions and territorial bodies).

The executive secretary of the IWG is a state civil servant of the city of Moscow, filling the position of the state civil service of the city of Moscow in the “managers” category in the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy.

Appendix 2. Regulations of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles

Appendix 2
to the order of the Moscow Government
dated February 24, 2012 N 78-RP
(As amended as put into effect
by order of the Moscow Government
dated August 11, 2015 N 453-RP. -
See previous edition)

Regulations for the work of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles

1. General Provisions

1.1. The regulations of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations) determine the procedure for the work of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of the stated needs with an initial (maximum) contract price of 100 million rubles (hereinafter - IWG) when considering the declared needs for goods, works, services of executive authorities of the city of Moscow, state government institutions of the city of Moscow, state budgetary institutions of the city of Moscow, state unitary enterprises of the city of Moscow, state unitary enterprises of the city of Moscow, in the authorized capital of which there is a share of the city of Moscow collectively exceeds 50 percent that carry out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law of April 5, 2013 N 44-FZ "On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services to meet state and municipal needs" Federal Law N 44-FZ ), as well as state unitary enterprises of the city of Moscow and business societies, in the authorized capital of which the share of the city of Moscow in total exceeds 50 percent, state autonomous and budgetary institutions of the city of Moscow, carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law of July 18, 2011 N 223- Federal Law "On the procurement of goods, works, services by certain types of legal entities" (hereinafter referred to as customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 223-FZ), on their validity and decision-making by the IWG on these issues, with the exception of:
(Paragraph as amended, put into effect on January 1, 2017 by order of the Moscow Government dated December 13, 2016 N 669-RP. - See previous edition)

Federal Law N 44-FZ, in goods, works, services related to the creation of a capital construction project;

- the needs of customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 223-FZ related to the creation of capital construction projects included in the address investment program city of Moscow.

1.2. The Moscow City Department for Competition Policy conducts a preliminary review of applications from customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 44-FZ, and customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 223-FZ (hereinafter also referred to as customers), and preparation of materials for the meeting of the IWG, organizes the current work of the IWG, monitors the elimination of comments by customers based on the results of consideration of applications of the IWG.

The procedure for preliminary consideration of applications is established by a legal act of the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy.

1.3. The IWG considers:

1.3.1. Applications for planned purchases (hereinafter referred to as procurement applications) with an initial (maximum) contract (agreement) price of over 100 million rubles.

1.3.2. Applications for procurement for which disagreements arose as a result of public procurement hearings, the initial (maximum) price of one of the lots for which, based on one year of execution, is from 500 million rubles (inclusive).

1.3.3. Applications for procurement for research, development and technological work, regardless of the size of the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement).

1.3.4. The clause became invalid on January 1, 2016 - ..

1.3.5. Proposals for approval of standard forms of documents (standard technical task, standard contract, standard criteria for evaluating applications from procurement participants) (hereinafter referred to as standard document forms).

1.3.6. Applications for procurement, regardless of the size of the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement) on the basis of instructions from the Mayor of Moscow and heads of city government complexes.
(Clause 1.3.6 was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated July 12, 2016 N 341-RP)

1.3. 7. Draft procurement plans and schedules containing information on purchases with an initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement) from 3 to 100 million rubles (hereinafter referred to as draft schedules).
(Clause 1.3.7 was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

1.3.8. Applications to increase the initial (maximum) contract price by no more than 10 percent without re-checking the reliability of determining the initial (maximum) contract price in relation to purchases carried out in accordance with the provisions of Federal Law of July 18, 2011 N 223-FZ "On Procurement" goods, works, services by certain types of legal entities" if the procurement procedure is declared unsuccessful.
(Clause 1.3.8 was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

1.3.9. Other needs for goods, works, services declared by customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 44-FZ.
(Clause 1.3.9 was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

1.4. The IWG reviews applications for procurement for:

1.4.1. The validity of the stated need and the feasibility of purchasing for the needs of the city of Moscow, ensuring the activities of customers.

1.4.2. Whether customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 44-FZ have limits on budgetary obligations for procurement.

1.4.3. The correctness of the determination and validity of the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement).

1.4.4. Absence of conditions limiting competition in procurement documentation.

1.4.5. Compliance of procurement documentation with legal requirements Russian Federation and other regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, legal acts of the city of Moscow on the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services to meet state and municipal needs and in the field of procurement of goods, works, services by certain types of legal entities.

1.4.6. The validity of purchases by customers for research, development and technological work, regardless of the size of the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement).

1.4.7. The feasibility and economic justification for customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 44-FZ, banking support of the contract (agreement) in the event that the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement) exceeds 500 million rubles, with the exception of contracts (agreements) ), containing a condition on the transfer of advance payments to the supplier (contractor, performer) only to a personal account opened for the supplier in the Moscow Department of Finance.

1.5. The clause became invalid on January 1, 2016 - decree of the Moscow Government dated August 11, 2015 N 453-RP..

1.6. Applications for procurement provided for in paragraphs 1.3.1-1.3.3 of these Regulations are submitted for consideration by the IWG only if there is approval of the relevant procurement by the executive authority of the city of Moscow, representing the interests of the city of Moscow in the management and control bodies of business entities of the city of Moscow with a share of the city of Moscow in the authorized capital, exercising the functions and powers of the founder of state institutions of the city of Moscow, by the executive authority of the city of Moscow, under the departmental subordination of which is the state unitary enterprise (state enterprise, state enterprise) of the city of Moscow (hereinafter referred to as the founder), and if the customer is executive body of the city of Moscow - if there is a decision of the head of the executive body of the city of Moscow to carry out the relevant procurement.

1.7. The draft schedules of customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 44-FZ, provided for in paragraph 1.3.7 of these Regulations, with the exception of executive authorities of the city of Moscow, are submitted for consideration to the IWG if there is an extract from the minutes of the meeting of the working group of the main manager of budget funds to verify the validity of the stated needs of subordinate institutions, enterprises and territorial bodies for approval of procurement, as well as in the presence of additional approvals in accordance with the joint order of the Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow, Department of Finance of the City of Moscow, Department of the City of Moscow for Competition Policy, Main Control Moscow City Administration.
(The paragraph was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

1.8. Applications to increase the initial (maximum) price of the contract, provided for in paragraph 1.3.8 of these Regulations, are submitted for consideration by the IWG only with the consent of the founder.
(The paragraph was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

1.9. The procedure for consideration by the IWG of other needs for goods, works, and services is established by a legal act of the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy.
(The paragraph was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

2. The procedure for considering applications for procurement

(The title as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government of November 15, 2016 N 591-RP.

2.1. The Moscow City Department for Competition Policy, on the basis of approved schedules and plans for the procurement of goods, works, services based on customer proposals, monthly, no later than the working day before the last meeting of the IWG in the current month, generates a preliminary list of planned purchases (hereinafter referred to as the preliminary list of purchases) for consideration at the IWG meetings next month.

2.2. If it is necessary to correct information about purchases in the preliminary list of purchases, exclude or introduce new purchases, the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy, at the proposals of customers, makes changes to the preliminary list of purchases no later than 4 working days before the set date for consideration of the relevant application at a meeting of the IWG.

2.3. Members of the IWG are informed about the preliminary list of purchases monthly at the IWG meeting.

2.4. 5 working days before the established date for consideration of an application for procurement at a meeting of the IWG, customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 223-FZ enter the following information about the procurement into the Unified Automated Information System of Bidding of the City of Moscow (hereinafter referred to as EAIST):

2.4.1. Information card.

2.4.2. Technical task.

2.4.3. Calculation of the initial (maximum) contract price with justification for the choice of method for determining the initial (maximum) price.

2.4.4. The customer's decision to make a purchase.

2.4.5. Draft agreement.

2.4.6. Specification of the goods supplied when purchasing goods (if available).

2.4.7. Conclusion on the reliability of determining the initial (maximum) price of the contract, the price of the contract concluded with a single supplier (contractor, performer), if the initial (maximum) price of the contract is 50 million rubles or more.

2.5. In addition to the information specified in paragraph 2.4 of these Regulations to be entered into the EAIST, when submitting an application for procurement for research, development and technological work for consideration by the IWG, the following is additionally placed in the EAIST:

2.5.1. Customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 44-FZ - justification of the need and feasibility of the procurement, indicating the expected results and an extract from the minutes of the working group of the main manager of budget funds to verify the validity of the stated needs of subordinate institutions, enterprises and territorial bodies for approval implementation of the purchase.
(Clause 2.5.1 as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP.

2.5.2. Customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 223-FZ - justification of the need and expediency of the purchase, indicating the expected results and approval of the purchase by the founder.

2.5(1). The procedure for providing the information specified in paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5 of these Regulations before the commissioning of the corresponding EAIST functionality is established by a legal act of the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy.
(Clause 2.5(1) was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

2.6. When submitting an application for procurement with an initial (maximum) price of a contract (agreement) of 500 million rubles, customers carrying out procurement activities in accordance with Federal Law N 44-FZ additionally post in EAIST a justification for the need and feasibility of providing banking support for the contract (agreement) ) or justification for refusal to provide the specified support.

2.7. The agenda of the IWG meeting is formed on the basis of a preliminary list of purchases and is brought to the attention of the IWG members no later than three working days before the day of the IWG meeting.

The agenda includes information about the procurement contained in the EAIST.

2.8. Applications for procurement are considered at a meeting of the IWG in person.

2.9. The presence of its members at the meeting of the IWG is mandatory. Decisions of the IWG are made by a majority vote of the number of members of the IWG present at the meeting. In case of equality of votes, the final decision is made by the chairman of the IWG, and in his absence - by the deputy chairman of the IWG presiding at the meeting of the IWG.
(Clause as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated November 13, 2018 N 764-RP.

2.9(1). A member of the IWG does not have the right to delegate his powers to another member of the IWG.

If it is impossible for a member of the IWG to attend a meeting, he is obliged to notify the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy in advance. In this case, a member of the IWG may transfer his powers to a state civil servant of the city of Moscow, filling a position in the state civil service of the city of Moscow in the category “managers” in the same executive body of the city of Moscow, having previously notified the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy.
(The paragraph was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 13, 2018 N 764-RP)

2.10. A meeting of the IWG is considered competent if more than half of its members are present.

2.11. Members of the IWG have equal rights when discussing issues considered at the meeting.

2.12. Depending on the issues under consideration, persons with at least three years of experience in the required field or special knowledge of the procurement object may be invited to participate in the meetings of the IWG.

2.13. When considering customer applications for procurement for research, development and technological work, representatives of the Moscow Department of Science, Industrial Policy and Entrepreneurship may be invited to participate in meetings of the IWG.

2.14. A representative of the customer and a representative of the founder are required to attend meetings of the IWG.

The customer's representative (with the exception of customers who are executive authorities of the city of Moscow) presents a copy of the document confirming his authority to the meeting of the IWG.

At the IWG meeting, the customer’s representative is required to provide oral explanations regarding the justification of the stated needs. If necessary, a customer representative may provide written explanations regarding the relevant procurement application, independently or based on comments received during the preliminary consideration of procurement applications by the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy.

2.15. Based on the results of consideration of applications for procurement, the IWG makes the following decisions:

2.15.1. Accept the application.

2.15.2. Accept the application subject to changing conditions.

2.15.3. Reject the application.

2.16. The decisions of the IWG are documented in a protocol approved by the chairman of the IWG meeting, indicating the comments of the IWG members.
(Clause as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated November 13, 2018 N 764-RP.

2.17. No later than two working days from the date of signing the minutes of the meeting of the IWG, the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy enters the information “Accept the application”, “Accept the application taking into account the change in conditions”, “Reject the application” into the EAIST.

2.18. The Moscow City Department for Competition Policy sends an extract from the minutes of the IWG meeting to customers and founders no later than one business day from the date of signing the IWG minutes.

2.19. The founder exercises control over the implementation by state government institutions of the city of Moscow, state autonomous and budgetary institutions of the city of Moscow, state unitary enterprises of the city of Moscow, business companies in the authorized capital of which the share of the city of Moscow in the aggregate exceeds 50 percent, instructions and elimination of comments given based on the results of the review applications for procurement at a meeting of the IWG.

2.20. The clause has lost force - order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP ..

2.21. If the IWG makes a decision “Accept the application subject to changing conditions,” the customer, depending on the comments received:

2.21.1. Makes appropriate changes to the procurement documentation posted in the EAIST within the time limits determined by the decision of the IWG.

2.21.2. Sends the procurement documentation for re-verification (examination) of the reliability of determining the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement) to the expert organization that issued the initial conclusion, taking into account the identified circumstances affecting the terms of the procurement.

2.21.3. Sends the procurement documentation for additional verification (examination) of the reliability of determining the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement) to the State Budgetary Institution of the City of Moscow "City Investment Management Agency", with the exception of procurement of works in relation to objects, project documentation for which, in accordance with the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation, is not subject to state examination or the estimated cost of which is not subject to verification of accuracy (including major and current repairs, landscaping, installation of pedestrian zones, demolition, local events, repair and restoration work), initial (maximum ) the price of the contract (agreement) is equal to or exceeds 50 million rubles.

2.21.4. Sends procurement documentation for verification (examination) of the reliability of determining the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement) for purchases, the initial (maximum) price of which does not exceed 10 million rubles.
(Clause 2.21 as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated July 12, 2016 N 341-RP.

2.21(1). Verification (examination) of the reliability of determining the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement) (clauses 2.21.2-2.21.4 of these Regulations) is carried out in accordance with the regulations approved by the Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow.
(Clause 2.21(1) was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated July 12, 2016 N 341-RP)

2.21(2). If, based on the results of the IWG's consideration of applications for procurement, there is a change in the procurement conditions that affect the initial (maximum) price of the contract (agreement), customers agree on the price with the Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow and the Main Control Department of the City of Moscow. The specified decision of the IWG is formalized in the form of an instruction in the minutes of the meeting of the IWG.
(Clause 2.21(2) was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated July 12, 2016 N 341-RP)

2.22. Review of procurement documentation finalized by customers is carried out by members of the IWG who provided comments in the manner and within the time frame determined by the decision of the IWG.

2.23. The procurement documentation must be posted in the Unified Procurement Information System in the same financial year in which the IWG decided to “Accept the application” or “Accept the application subject to changes in conditions.”
(The paragraph was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

2.24. If procurement documentation is not posted after three months from the date of its consideration at a meeting of the IWG, with the exception of cases of consideration of the application at a meeting of the IWG after September 25, and the need for a product, work, or service continues, the customer is obliged to submit an application to the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy to carry out the procurement for its subsequent re-consideration at a meeting of the IWG.

In the event of failure to post procurement documentation for applications considered at a meeting of the IWG after September 25 in the same financial year in which the decision of the IWG was made, provided for in paragraphs 2.15.1 and 2.15.2 of these Regulations, and the need for the product, work, or service persists, the customer is obliged to submit a procurement application to the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy for its subsequent re-consideration at a meeting of the IWG.
(The paragraph was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

2.25. Reconsideration of applications at a meeting of the IWG is carried out in the manner established by Section 2 of these Regulations.
(The paragraph was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

3. The procedure for considering applications to change the terms of the contract (agreement)

(The section became invalid on January 1, 2016 - decree of the Moscow Government dated August 11, 2015 N 453-RP.

4. Procedure for reviewing standard forms of documents

4.1. The Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow, together with the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy, the Main Control Directorate of the City of Moscow, no later than 4 working days before the date of the next meeting of the IWG, makes proposals for the approval of standard forms of documents agreed upon by the executive authority of the city of Moscow in accordance with with the industry specifics of the procurement being carried out and the Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government, who coordinates the activities of the relevant sphere of city government.

In the absence of the corresponding Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government, approval of standard forms of documents is carried out directly by the head of the executive authority of the city of Moscow in accordance with the industry specifics of the procurement being carried out.

4.2. The Moscow City Department for Competition Policy makes proposals for the approval of standard forms of documents on the agenda of the next meeting of the IWG.

4.3. Based on the results of consideration of standard forms of documents, the IWG makes the following decisions:

4.3.1. Approve standard forms of documents.

4.3.2. Reject standard document forms.

4.4. The decisions of the IWG are documented in a protocol approved by the chairman of the IWG meeting, indicating the comments of the IWG members.
(Clause as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated November 13, 2018 N 764-RP.

4.5. No later than two working days from the date of signing the minutes of the IWG meeting, the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy enters the information “Approve standard document forms”, “Reject standard document forms”, “Send standard document forms for revision” to the EAIST.

5. The procedure for reviewing draft schedules

(The section was additionally included by order of the Moscow Government dated November 15, 2016 N 591-RP)

5.1. Customers have the right to submit draft schedules for consideration by the IWG once a quarter, except for the cases provided for in paragraph 5.2 of these Regulations.

5.2. Information on procurement with an initial (maximum) contract (agreement) price of 3 to 100 million rubles, contained in the draft schedule, may be submitted by the customer to the IWG for consideration more than once a quarter if:

5.2.1. Additional budgetary allocations have been allocated for the implementation of the event, within the framework of which procurement is required.

5.2.2. The purchase is planned to be carried out using savings generated in the procurement process.

5.2.3. The terms of purchase have been changed.

5.2.4. The purchase is planned to be carried out on the basis of instructions from the Mayor of Moscow or the Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government.

5.2.5. The purchase is planned to be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the legal act of the Moscow Government, the implementation of which requires the purchase.

5.3. Three working days before the set date for consideration of the draft schedules of the IWG, the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy sends the draft schedules to the members of the IWG.

5.4. Draft schedules are reviewed in absentia by all members of the IWG.

5.5. Based on the results of the absentee consideration, the IWG members make decisions:

5.5.1. Consider the draft schedule at a meeting of the IWG in person.

5.5.2. Accept the draft schedule.

5.6. If one of the members of the IWG makes a decision provided for in paragraph 5.5.1 of these Regulations, the draft schedule is considered at a meeting of the IWG in a manner similar to the procedure established by Section 2 of these Regulations.

5.7. Based on the results of consideration of draft plans and schedules at a meeting, the IWG makes the following decisions:

5.7.1. Accept the draft schedule.

5.7.2. Accept the draft schedule subject to a verification (examination) of the reliability of determining the initial (maximum) price of a procurement contract, the initial (maximum) price of which does not exceed 10 million rubles.

5.7.3. Accept the draft schedule taking into account changes in procurement conditions.

5.7.4. Reject the draft schedule.

5.7.5. Another solution.

5.8. The decisions of the IWG, provided for in paragraphs 5.5.2 and 5.7 of these Regulations, are documented in a general protocol approved by the chairman of the IWG meeting, indicating the comments of the IWG members (if any).
(Clause as amended, put into effect by order of the Moscow Government dated November 13, 2018 N 764-RP.

5.9. If the IWG makes a decision requiring re-consideration of the draft schedule, the draft schedule is considered in the manner established by this section.

Revision of the document taking into account
changes and additions prepared
JSC "Kodeks"

No. 78-RP dated February 24, 2012 On the creation of an Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of purchases declared by customers with an initial (maximum) contract price from 100 million rubles to 1 billion rubles

February 24, 2012 N 78-RP On the creation of an Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of purchases declared by customers with an initial (maximum) contract price from 100 million rubles to 1 billion rubles In order to strengthen control over the validity of spending funds from the budget of the city of Moscow in accordance with the approved state programs of the city of Moscow: 1. Create an Interdepartmental working group to verify the validity of purchases declared by customers with an initial (maximum) contract price from 100 million rubles to 1 billion rubles . 2. Approve the composition of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of purchases declared by customers with an initial (maximum) contract price from 100 million rubles to 1 billion rubles in accordance with Appendix 1 to this order. of the city of Moscow." 4.2. Order of the First Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government dated December 16, 2009 N 106-РЗМ "On approval of the procedures for submitting information and making decisions on the placement of government orders by the Temporary Working Group." - 2 - 4.3 Order of the Moscow Government dated July 9, 2010 N 1438-RP “On introducing amendments to the order of the Moscow Government dated August 19, 2009 N 1828-RP”. 5. Entrust control over the implementation of this order to the Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Government. Moscow on economic policy issues Sharonova A.V. P.P. Mayor of Moscow S.S. Sobyanin Appendix 1 to the order of the Moscow Government dated February 24, 2012 N 78-RP Composition of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of purchases declared by customers initial (maximum) contract price from 100 million rubles to 1 billion rubles Chairman: Sharonov A.V. - Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government for economic policy Members: Ogloblina M.E. - Minister of the Moscow Government, Head of the Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow V.E. Chistova. - Minister of the Moscow Government, Head of the Department of Finance of the City of Moscow Degtev G.V. - Head of the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy E.N. Polyakov. - Chairman of the Control Committee of the City of Moscow - Representative of the Office of the Federal Antimonopoly Service for Moscow (as agreed) - Representative of the main manager of budget funds (on issues of placing orders of subordinate institutions and territorial bodies) Executive Secretary: Romanova O.N. - Deputy Head of the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy Appendix 2 to the order of the Moscow Government dated February 24, 2012 N 78-RP REGULATIONS for the work of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of purchases declared by customers with an initial (maximum) contract price from 100 million rubles to 1 billion rubles 1. General provisions 1.1. These Regulations determine the procedure for the work of the Interdepartmental Working Group to verify the validity of purchases declared by customers with an initial (maximum) contract price from 100 million rubles (inclusive) to 1 billion rubles (hereinafter referred to as the IWG), with the exception of tenders related to capital construction, and making decisions by the IWG on these issues. 1.2. The preparation of materials for consideration by the IWG and the organization of the current work of the IWG is carried out by the Moscow City Department for Competition Policy (Tender Committee). trading "Operational calendar" (hereinafter referred to as the Subsystem). 3.4. If it is impossible to participate in a meeting, a member of the IWG may transfer his powers in the prescribed manner to another official. 1.3. The IWG reviews customer applications for placing an order (hereinafter referred to as the application) for the necessity of the stated need for goods, works, services, bidding conditions, validity of technical specifications, calculation of the initial (maximum) contract price, the presence (absence) of conditions limiting competition in bidding. 1.4. The IWG evaluates the application based on the following factors: 1.4.1. The customer has a free balance of the limits of budget obligations.

1.4.2. The validity of the stated need and the feasibility of placing an order for the needs of the city of Moscow, ensuring the activities of state budgetary institutions.

Moscow, July 27. – The Government of the Russian Federation, under the leadership of Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation Arkady Dvorkovich and Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation Andrey Belousov, held a meeting of the interdepartmental working group (IWG) on the development and implementation of the National Technology Initiative under the Presidium of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation for Economic Modernization and Innovative Development of Russia . One of the items on the agenda was consideration of the draft “road map” in the direction of EnergyNet. Its development, together with the business community from the Ministry of Energy of Russia, was led by the First Deputy Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation, co-leader of the working group in the EnergyNet direction, Alexey Teksler, who took part in the meeting.

The EnergyNet “road map” is aimed at developing domestic integrated smart energy systems and services and ensuring the leadership of Russian companies in new high-tech markets of the global “energy of the future” in the next 15-20 years. To achieve these goals, the document provides for a number of technical “pilot” projects, as well as a set of measures to develop the regulatory framework and technical standards, improvement of the sphere vocational education. The preparation of the draft “road map” was carried out in active cooperation with fuel and energy companies and the expert community. The document was also approved by interested federal authorities.
Based on the results of the discussion at the IWG meeting, the draft road map was approved, and a decision was made on the advisability of sending it for consideration and further approval by the presidium of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation for economic modernization and innovative development. A meeting of the Council Presidium is scheduled for September.

For reference: National Technology Initiative (NTI), announced by the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin on December 4, 2014 in his Address to Federal Assembly, is a long-term comprehensive program to create conditions for ensuring the leadership of Russian companies in new high-tech markets that will determine the structure of the world economy in the next 15-20 years.

The implementation of “road maps” is carried out in the form of projects, the development, selection and implementation of which are carried out in accordance with the Regulations on the development, selection, implementation and monitoring of projects in order to implement action plans (“road maps”) of the National Technology Initiative, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated April 18, 2016 No. 317 “On the implementation of the National Technology Initiative.”

Interdepartmental working group on issues of reducing differences between the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of the level of information development, the Presidential Council for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation is a permanent coordinating body formed for the purpose of forming and implementing a coordinated policy in the field of development and use of information and communication technologies in the regions and for information -analytical and expert support for the activities of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation.

Composition of the Interdepartmental Working Group on Reducing Differences between the Subjects of the Russian Federation in Level of Information Development

Luzhkov Yu. M. Mayor of Moscow (head of the interdepartmental working group)
Andreechkin A.E. Deputy Head of the FSB Service of Russia
Aratsky D.B. Deputy Minister regional development Russian Federation
Volonchunas V.V. Mayor of Yaroslavl
Degtyarev S.S. Deputy Director of the Department of Territorial Policy of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia
Dudov N.N. Governor of the Magadan Region
Egorov V.K. Rector of the Russian Academy civil service under the President of the Russian Federation
Ermolaev A.V. Director of the Department public policy in the field of informatization and information technologies of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications of Russia
Kovalev O.I. Governor of the Ryazan region
Kuchin S.V. Deputy Prime Minister - Chief of Staff of the Government of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Ugra
Leksin V. N. Head of the Laboratory of System Diagnostics of Socio-Economic Processes of the Institute system analysis RAS
Miklushevsky V.V. Deputy Minister of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
Mikhalchuk I.F. Head of Administration of the Arkhangelsk Region
Mishcheryakov Yu. N. Mayor of Orenburg
Naumov S. A. Deputy Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation
Simakov O.V. Director of the Department of Informatization of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
Sokolov M. M. Vice-President of the International Assembly of Capitals and Major Cities
Soldatov A. A. Deputy Minister of Communications and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation
Sukonkin A.V. Deputy Director of the Department of Science and Education - Head of the Department of Science and Innovation of the Ministry of Culture of Russia
Khokhlov Yu. E. Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Institute for the Development of the Information Society
Chernyshev M. A. Mayor of Rostov-on-Don
Chirkunov O. A. Governor of the Perm Territory
Sharov A.V. Director of the Department of State Regulation in Economics of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia
Shipov V.V. Director of the Department of Public Administration, Regional Development and Local Self-Government of the Government of the Russian Federation
Schrader V.F. Mayor of Omsk
Yurevich M.V. Mayor of Chelyabinsk
Kalmyk S. A. First Deputy Head of the Moscow City Informatization Department (Executive Secretary of the Interdepartmental Working Group)

Regulations on the interdepartmental working group on reducing differences between the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of information development

The purpose of creating an interdepartmental working group on reducing differences between the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of the level of information development (hereinafter referred to as the IWG) is strategic planning, coordination of informatization processes and the development of the information society in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The mission of the IWG is to coordinate the processes of regional informatization and assist the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in matters of increasing the pace of development of the information society.

Main areas of work

1. Formation of strategic directions, determination of target indicators for achieving results in the main directions of the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation in the field of regional informatization, determination of conceptual foundations in the field of development of the information society.

2. Development of proposals that take into account the interests of the regions and submission of them for discussion at the meeting of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Council).

3. Interaction within the framework of their tasks with federal government bodies, as well as other interdepartmental working groups under the Council.

4. Development of programs and projects for regional informatization and development of the information society in the regions, development of proposals for changes to existing programs and projects, as well as presentation of these programs and projects for discussion at Council meetings.

5. Analysis of the practice of implementing the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation in the regions, assessing the effectiveness of measures aimed at developing the information society in the regions, as well as preparing proposals for improving activities in this area.

6. Promoting interaction between regions in order to exchange best practices in the field of development of the information society.

Work principles

1. Organization of the work of the IWG.

1.1. Meetings of the IWG are held once a quarter. If necessary, it is possible to hold an extraordinary meeting of the IWG.

1.2. The IWG includes the head of the IWG, deputy heads of the IWG, the executive secretary of the IWG, representatives of federal government bodies, representatives of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation at the level of not lower than the deputy head of the region, representatives of city administrations at the level of the mayor of the city, representatives of other interdepartmental working groups of the Council formed under Council, representatives of the Council's expert advisory group.

Deputy heads of the IWG are appointed by the head of the IWG in the prescribed manner.

1.3. The activities of the IWG include interaction with other interdepartmental working groups formed under the Council and federal government bodies. Representatives of federal government bodies and representatives of constituent entities of the Russian Federation may be invited to meetings of the IWG.

1.4. The results of the IWG's work are documented in the minutes of the IWG meeting. The protocol is sent to all members of the IWG and heads of the highest government bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

1.5 Ensuring the functioning of the IWG is carried out by the Office of the IWG. The work of the IWG Office is provided by the Moscow Government.

2. Distribution of tasks in the field of regional informatization.

2.1. To achieve its goals and implement tasks, the IWG actively interacts with other interdepartmental working groups created under the Council, with interested federal and regional government bodies and the expert advisory group of the Council through their representatives within the IWG and the regional informatization council.

2.2. The IWG, in cooperation with other interdepartmental working groups created under the Council, develops proposals on strategic directions, determining the values of target indicators for achieving results in areas and conceptual requirements in the field of development of the information society in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, including on issues of regional informatization, in in accordance with the implementation plan for the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation.

2.3. The IWG considers proposals from the Regional Informatization Council, prepares draft decisions and submits them for consideration by the Council. The implementation of specific measures in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation on the development of the information society in accordance with the decisions of the Council is the responsibility of the relevant executive authorities.

2.4. Ensuring coordination and management of programs and activities in the field of regional informatization is carried out by the IWG in cooperation with the regional informatization council.

Russian

English

Arabic German English Spanish French Hebrew Italian Japanese Dutch Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Turkish

Based on your request, these examples may contain crude language.

Based on your request, these examples may contain colloquial language.

Translation of "interdepartmental working group on" in Chinese

(16 examples containing translation)

" lang="en"> Inter-Ministerial Working Group on

View examples with translation
(15 examples containing translation)

" lang="en"> interdepartmental working group on

View examples with translation
(7 examples containing translation)

" lang="en"> interdepartmental working group to

View examples with translation inter-ministerial working group for
(6 examples containing translation)

" lang="en"> inter-ministerial working group for

View examples with translation Inter-agency Working Group on

" lang="en"> Inter-agency Working Group on

View examples with translation Inter-Departmental Working Group on
(3 examples containing translation)

" lang="en"> Inter-Departmental Working Group on

View examples with translation Inter-agency Working Group for
(2 examples containing translation)

" lang="en"> Inter-agency Working Group for

Other translations

In order to integrate gender perspectives into statistical work, the government has also created an informal gender issues and statistics.

To mainstream gender into statistical work, the Government has also established an informal gender and statistics.

Inter-ministerial working group on gender and statistics.">

Human Rights Affairs decided to create a Centralized Police Register containing computerized current information on all arrests and detentions of suspects under the Emergency Regulations.

The Inter-Ministerial Working Group on Human Rights Issues decided to establish a Central Police Registry, containing computerized current information relating to all arrests and detentions of suspects under the provisions of the Emergency Regulations.

Inter-Ministerial Working Group on Human Rights Issues decided to establish a Central Police Registry, containing computerized current information relating to all arrests and detentions of suspects under the provisions of the Emergency Regulations.">

Program to protect ecosystems from disease and air pollution: a permanent program was established in 1984 interdepartmental working group on Forest Health, which collects information on the state of forests and develops policies and measures in response to specific problems.

The Program for the protection of ecosystems against pests and air pollution: a standing the health of forests has been in existence since 1984 to provide information on forest health problems and strategies and action to tackle specific problems.

Interdepartmental working group on the health of forests has been in existence since 1984 to provide information on forest health problems and strategies and action to tackle specific problems.">

Interdepartmental working group on The Universal Periodic Review, composed of representatives from all relevant government ministries, responded to the remaining 50 recommendations contained in the addendum.

The Interdepartmental Working Group on the universal periodic review, comprising representatives from all relevant Government departments, had responded to 50 outstanding recommendations in the addendum.

Interdepartmental Working Group on the universal periodic review, comprising representatives from all relevant Government departments, had responded to 50 outstanding recommendations in the addendum.">

Interdepartmental working group on studying the state of observance of human rights and freedoms by law enforcement and other government agencies;

Interdepartmental working group to monitor the observance of human rights and freedoms by law-enforcement and other State bodies;

Interdepartmental working group to monitor the observance of human rights and freedoms by law-enforcement and other State bodies;">

Coordination of the implementation of the Action Plan is carried out by Interdepartmental working group on studying the state of compliance by law enforcement agencies with human rights, the results of which are regularly covered in the media.

The implementation of the plan of action is being coordinated by the interdepartmental working group to monitor the observation of human rights by law enforcement agencies. The results of the group's work are published in the mass media.

Interdepartmental working group to monitor the observation of human rights by law enforcement agencies. The results of the group's work are published in the mass media.">

Functions effectively Interdepartmental working group on the fight against hazing, assault and other violent crimes, which includes high-ranking officials of federal executive authorities and military law enforcement agencies.

The interdepartmental working group on combating humiliating treatment, assault and other violent offenses in the Armed Forces, which comprises senior officials of the federal authorities and of military law enforcement agencies, is functioning effectively.

Interdepartmental working group on combating humiliating treatment, assault and other violent offenses in the Armed Forces, which comprises senior officials of the federal authorities and of military law enforcement agencies, is functioning effectively.">

Federal Interdepartmental working group on Human Trafficking brings together 17 departments and agencies working together to strengthen Canada's response to human trafficking.

The federal Interdepartmental Working Group on Trafficking in Persons brings together 17 departments and agencies that work together to strengthen Canadian anti-trafficking responses.

Interdepartmental Working Group on Trafficking in Persons brings together 17 departments and agencies that work together to strengthen Canadian anti-trafficking responses.">

Autumn 2006: Interdepartmental working group on mainstreaming gender into the budgeting process

Inter-ministerial Working Group on Gender Mainstreaming Introduced to Gender Budgeting Concepts">

Permanent Interdepartmental Committee and Interdepartmental working group on Human Rights Affairs will continue to monitor the situation with regard to the use of torture.

The Permanent Inter-Ministerial Standing Committee and the Inter-Ministerial Working Group on Human Rights Issues will continue to monitor the situation relating to torture.

Inter-Ministerial Working Group on Human Rights Issues will continue to monitor the situation relating to torture.">

For example, federal Interdepartmental working group on Forced Marriage and Violence in Defense of Honor, created in 2011, acts as a coordinator joint activities in supporting efforts to prevent and combat violence.

For example, a federal Interdepartmental Working Group on Forced Marriage and "Honour" Based Violence, created in 2011, acts as a focal point for collaborative efforts to support intervention and prevention efforts.

Interdepartmental Working Group on Forced Marriage and "Honour" Based Violence, created in 2011, acts as a focal point for collaborative efforts to support intervention and prevention efforts.">

In order to prevent hazing in the troops and coordinate joint actions with military command and control bodies to eradicate the causes that give rise to these negative processes, the Interdepartmental working group on combating hazing, assault and other violent crimes.

The Interdepartmental Working Group on combating humiliating treatment, assault and other violent offenses is working to prevent these negative phenomena and is coordinating concerted efforts undertaken with the military authorities to eliminate the factors that give rise to them.

Interdepartmental Working Group on combating humiliating treatment, assault and other violent offenses is working to prevent these negative phenomena and is coordinating concerted efforts undertaken with the military authorities to eliminate the factors that give rise to them.">

Newly created Interdepartmental working group on Gender Issues is exploring the possibility of adding gender advisers to each ministry, with a view, inter alia, to introducing programs across all ministries to further encourage women's representation.

The newly established Inter-Ministerial Working Group on Gender is considering the employment of gender advisers within each ministry with a view to, inter alia, initiating programs for the further promotion of female participation within the ministries.

Inter-Ministerial Working Group on Gender is considering the employment of gender advisers within each ministry with a view to, inter alia, initiating programs for the further promotion of female participation within the ministries.">

As for torture, interdepartmental working group on Human Rights Obliges the Special Investigations Unit of the Sri Lanka Police to examine all allegations of acts of torture brought to its attention by Special Rapporteurs under the supervision of the Unit prosecution persons committing acts of torture, which is part of the Office of the Prosecutor General.

The inter-ministerial working group on human rights with respect to torture assigned investigations to the police special investigations unit, in respect of torture accusation made by the Special Rapporteurs. The investigations were overseen by the Office of the Attorney-General's unit for the prosecution of torturers.

Inter-ministerial working group on human rights with respect to torture assigned investigations to the police special investigations unit, in respect of torture accusation made by the Special Rapporteurs. The investigations were overseen by the Office of the Attorney-General"s unit for the prosecution of torturers.">

On the interdepartmental working group to combat illegal financial transactions. Translation of "interdepartmental working group on" in Chinese